Leetcode 886: Possible Bipartition
You are given a group of n people, labeled from 1 to n. Each person may dislike other people, and they should not be placed in the same group. Your task is to determine if it is possible to split the group of people into two subgroups, such that no one in the same group dislikes each other. Each pair of dislikes is represented by an array of two people who cannot be in the same group. Return true if such a split is possible, otherwise return false.
Problem
Approach
Steps
Complexity
Input: You are given an integer n, representing the number of people, and an array dislikes, where each element is a pair [ai, bi], indicating that person ai dislikes person bi.
Example: Input: n = 4, dislikes = [[1,2],[1,3],[2,4]]
Constraints:
• 1 <= n <= 2000
• 0 <= dislikes.length <= 10^4
• dislikes[i].length == 2
• 1 <= ai < bi <= n
• All the pairs of dislikes are unique.
Output: Return true if it is possible to split the people into two groups such that no one dislikes anyone in the same group. Otherwise, return false.
Example: Output: true
Constraints:
• The output should be a boolean indicating whether the split is possible.
Goal: The goal is to verify if the graph representing the dislikes is bipartite, meaning the people can be split into two groups such that no two people in the same group dislike each other.
Steps:
• Represent the dislikes as a graph where each person is a node, and an edge between two nodes means they dislike each other.
• Use a graph traversal algorithm (like DFS or BFS) to check if the graph can be colored with two colors (representing two groups) such that no two adjacent nodes (people) have the same color.
Goal: The problem should be solved within the given constraints efficiently.
Steps:
• The number of people n can be up to 2000, so the solution should be optimized to handle large inputs efficiently.
• The dislikes array can have up to 10^4 pairs.
Assumptions:
• Each pair of dislikes represents a mutual dislike between two people.
• It is assumed that there are no other relationships besides dislikes.
• Input: Input: n = 4, dislikes = [[1,2],[1,3],[2,4]]
• Explanation: In this case, the dislikes form a bipartite graph, meaning we can split the people into two groups. Group 1 can be [1, 4], and Group 2 can be [2, 3]. No one in the same group dislikes each other.
• Input: Input: n = 3, dislikes = [[1,2],[1,3],[2,3]]
• Explanation: In this case, it is impossible to split the people into two groups, because person 1 dislikes both person 2 and person 3, and person 2 and person 3 also dislike each other. Therefore, more than two groups are needed.
Approach: To solve this problem, we will model the people and their dislikes as a graph and check if the graph is bipartite. A bipartite graph is one where we can divide the set of nodes into two disjoint sets such that no two adjacent nodes belong to the same set.
Observations:
• This is a classic graph problem where we need to check for bipartiteness using graph traversal techniques.
• Using BFS or DFS, we can attempt to color the nodes and check if we encounter any conflicts where two connected nodes end up with the same color.
Steps:
• Create a graph where each person is a node, and each dislike is an edge between two nodes.
• Perform BFS or DFS starting from any unvisited node, coloring the node with one color and trying to color all its adjacent nodes with the opposite color.
• If you encounter a node that is already colored with the same color as the current node, return false because it means the graph is not bipartite.
• If all nodes are visited without conflict, return true.
Empty Inputs:
• If there are no dislikes, it's trivially possible to split the people into two groups.
Large Inputs:
• Ensure the solution handles cases where n is large (up to 2000) and dislikes can be up to 10^4.
Special Values:
• If dislikes are sparse (few pairs), the problem is easier to solve, as fewer constraints are placed on the groups.
Constraints:
• Be mindful of the time complexity, as a solution with O(n + m) complexity will be efficient enough for large inputs.
bool possibleBipartition(int n, vector<vector<int>>& dlk) {
UF* uf = new UF(n + 1);
vector<vector<int>> gph(n + 1);
for(int i = 0; i < dlk.size(); i++) {
gph[dlk[i][0]].push_back(dlk[i][1]);
gph[dlk[i][1]].push_back(dlk[i][0]);
}
for(int i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
for(int x: gph[i]) {
if(uf->find(x) == uf->find(i)) return false;
uf->uni(gph[i][0], x);
}
}
return true;
}
1 : Function
bool possibleBipartition(int n, vector<vector<int>>& dlk) {
Define the function that checks if the graph can be bipartitioned into two sets. It takes the number of nodes and a list of edges.
2 : Data Initialization
UF* uf = new UF(n + 1);
Create a new union-find (UF) structure to manage the connected components. The size is n + 1 to accommodate 1-based indexing.
3 : Data Initialization
vector<vector<int>> gph(n + 1);
Initialize an adjacency list (graph) to store the edges. Each node will have a list of nodes it's connected to.
4 : Edge Processing
for(int i = 0; i < dlk.size(); i++) {
Loop through all edges in the input list (dlk) to build the graph.
5 : Edge Processing
gph[dlk[i][0]].push_back(dlk[i][1]);
For each edge, add the connection from the first node to the second node in the adjacency list.
6 : Edge Processing
gph[dlk[i][1]].push_back(dlk[i][0]);
Add the reverse connection from the second node to the first node, since the graph is undirected.
7 : Bipartition Check
for(int i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
Loop through each node to check its connections and determine if the graph can be bipartitioned.
8 : Bipartition Check
for(int x: gph[i]) {
For each connected node, check if it conflicts with the current node's partition.
9 : Bipartition Check
if(uf->find(x) == uf->find(i)) return false;
If both nodes belong to the same set, return false, as this indicates a conflict in the bipartition.
10 : Union Operation
uf->uni(gph[i][0], x);
Union the current node with the connected node, indicating they belong to the same set.
11 : Return
return true;
If no conflicts were found, return true, indicating that the graph can be bipartitioned.
Best Case: O(n + m)
Average Case: O(n + m)
Worst Case: O(n + m)
Description: In the worst case, we traverse all the nodes and edges of the graph once, which takes O(n + m) time.
Best Case: O(n + m)
Worst Case: O(n + m)
Description: The space complexity is O(n + m) because we need to store the graph and color information for each person.
LeetCode Solutions Library / DSA Sheets / Course Catalog |
---|
comments powered by Disqus